
Your AI passed its compliance review in March. It's June. Is it still the same AI?
A patient sees her doctor on Monday. On Wednesday she calls back about her new medication, with a question about a side effect or the dose.
In a good experience, your AI assistant already knows who she is. It picks up where the visit left off, and she does not have to re-explain her history, her medication or her allergy list.
Pause on what just happened underneath that smooth moment. Her clinical history, her active prescriptions and her identity, all of it protected health information (PHI), were carried forward, held in context, and very likely passed between systems and between AI models to make the conversation feel effortless.
Every one of those handoffs is a decision a regulator cares about:
You may have validated all of this at launch. AI drifts anyway, in at least four ways:
A point-in-time compliance report is a photograph. Your AI is a video.
That is the gap Aggi ARIA (Aggi Responsible Intelligence Assessor) closes. We continuously test whether your AI actually follows your policy on minimum-necessary PHI, refusal behavior, hallucination and BAA boundaries, and hand you the evidence on the day a health system's security team asks. You get behavioral proof, refreshed continuously.
Responsible AI, Verified.
If you are building patient-facing AI: when procurement asks you to prove your model still behaves the way it did at launch, what do you show them?
Aggi Technologies LLC helps regulated organizations govern AI behavior with Aggi ARIA and the Aggi ARIA AI Health Check (ARIA Shape B). Talk to us β
Written for people who have to make decisions about AI. What happened, why it matters, and what to do about it, with every source linked so you can check the work yourself.
The newsletter is published on LinkedIn. Subscribe there and LinkedIn will let you know when each new issue is out.
Subscribe on LinkedInLinkedIn handles your subscription; we never see or store your email address.